Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  21 / 24 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 24 Next Page
Page Background

WORLD-GENERATION NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2016

21

blade walls thinner could result in 0.5%

efficiency gains for a turbine like the SGT-

800, Navrotsky says.

AM is a “game changer,” Navrotsky

says. But Siemens is not converting all its

turbine manufacturing to AM. “We can’t

apply AM to simpler components; it would

be too expensive,” he says.

The company’s strategy is to use AM

for high tech components, such as burner

tips, burners and turbine blades where

there is a high potential to add efficiency,

enhance flexibility in the design process or

reduce costs. Otherwise, the company will

use conventional methods to manufacture

the rest of the turbine.

As Siemens ramps up AM production

for the more complex components, it

expects the cost of AM to decline, making

it feasible to use in simpler components.

Even with the savings of time and

materials, Siemens does not see the main

benefit of AM as simple cost reduction, at

least not yet.

The cost of manufacturing a burner tip

using AM is about the same as the cost of

conventional manufacturing, but the AM

part has better performance specs and,

eventually, could be manufactured at half

the cost, said Navrotsky.

Right now AM in Finspang is a

research and development effort. “We are

not looking at the bottom line because it

could be a distraction,” Fors said.

He admits that AM has not yet added

to Siemens’ bottom line, but it has “added

value for customers and made us more

competitive.”

Fors said the company’s AM efforts are

about taking the manufacturing process “to

the next level” and “scaling it up so that

down the road we will have cost benefits.”

In Fors’ vision, making turbine parts

using AM is part of a larger process of

re-inventing and digitizing the

manufacturing process. In that scenario,

AM starts in the design phase with

computer aided design (CAD).

As Fors points out, combining CAD and

AM is a radical shift for design engineers.

AM breaks down some of the physical

constraints of traditional engineering by

making it possible to more readily bridge

the gap between conception and execution.

In conventional manufacturing,

engineers designed parts within the

parameters of the manufacturing process.

AM allows almost any design to be realized.

To use the company’s phrase, “If you can

dream it, you can print it.”

In addition to giving greater design

flexibility, AM also allows for a quicker

vetting of design concepts. Prototypes can

be quickly made and tested, providing rapid

feedback. That results in a less risk averse

design process and shorter lead times.

In traditional manufacturing, failure is

to be avoided at all costs. It is expensive

and time consuming. One of the biggest

changes that AM is introducing into

manufacturing is an erosion of the built-in

conservative bias of engineers. Fors says it

is hard to get engineers to adopt that

mindset or to think that “to fail is not a big

deal, as long as you fail cheaply.”

Something, he points out, that is made

possible by AM.

Design and manufacturing are just two

of the steps in the manufacturing process

that Siemens hopes to knit together into a

single digital process. Those steps – design,

processing, post processing,

instrumentation and testing – are now

islands, says Andreas Graichen, Siemens’

group manager in the AM center of

competence in Finspang. Instead of islands,

Graichen sees those steps being brought

together in a seamless digital process that

incorporates feedback loops and self

healing processes.

Eventually that will enable

manufacturing to be handled remotely and

even in the cloud. In that scenario, Siemens

sees AM resulting in big gains in the

manufacturing process, including a 75%

reduction in development time, a 50%

reduction in lead time, 60% faster repairs

and 63% fewer resources used in

production.

PERSPECTIVE

RECOMMENDATIONS

What can you do to better avoid falling

victim to a damaging and often costly

cyberattack? Consider these

recommendations for the most common

types of attacks on the energy & utilities

industry:

Cyber espionage intrusions:

• Patch promptly.

• Track and monitor all inputs: Keep

good logs and review consistently to help

identify malicious activity.

• Train your staff: Developing

security awareness within your

organization is critical especially with the

rise in phishing attacks.

Crimeware attacks:

• Patch anti-virus and browsers.

• Capture data on attacks.

• Implement configuration change

monitoring.

• Monitor user behavior. Put

processes in place to track daily system

usage, particularly for anyone with access

to financial account details or personally

identifiable information.

• Denial-of-service (DOS) attacks:

• Segregate key servers: separate

critical systems onto different network

circuits.

• Have a mitigation plan: Know the

details of your DoS mitigation service.

Brief key operations staff on the best

course of action should an incident occur.

• Test for gaps: Test and update your

plan regularly as your infrastructure and

processes change, and as new DoS

techniques emerge.

• Also, given that many attacks come

through vendors, seek out partners that

also use strong authentication.

Additional cybersecurity information

and resources are available at

verizonenterprise.com.

CYBERSECURITY SNAPSHOT

CONTINUED FROM PAGE 12

HEAVY INDUSTRY IS MOVINGTOTHE CLOUD

CONTINUED FROM PAGE 6